Watergate Revisited

The 43rd anniversary of the January 30, 1973 convictions of former Nixon aides G. Gordon Liddy and James W. McCord Jr. for conspiracy, burglary and wiretapping in connection with the break-in at the Watergate hotel brings to mind the turbulent years leading to the only presidential resignation in US history. The conviction was later upheld in United States v. Liddy, 509 F. 2d 428 (D.C.Cir. 1974).

The BLS Library has an extensive collection of material related to the Watergate scandal. One item was written by a noted alumnus of Brooklyn Law School, the late Leonard Garment (Class of 1949) who later became a member of the BLS Board of Trustees and an Adjunct Professor of Law. Garment (1924 – 2013) was an attorney who served Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford in various positions from 1969 to 1976, including Counselor to the President, acting Special Counsel to Nixon for the last two years of his presidency, and U.S. Ambassador to the Third Committee at the United Nations. Born in Brooklyn, he graduated Brooklyn Law School and joined the law firm of Mudge, Stern, Baldwin, and Todd (later called Nixon, Mudge, Rose, Guthrie & Alexander). There, Garment met Nixon and then worked on his 1968 presidential campaign, later becoming part of Nixon’s White House staff as special consultant to the president. He advised the president and worked on various special projects, particularly on civil and human rights, Indian affairs, and the arts.

His 418 page Garmentbook Crazy Rhythm: From Brooklyn and Jazz to Nixon’s White House, Watergate, and Beyond (Call No. E856 .G38 1997) is a fascinating autobiography of a Washington/Wall Street insider who thrived despite hard blows dealt him on more than one occasion. Garment tells how he left home early to pursue a career as a clarinet/saxophone player in jazz bands. After serving in WW II, he earned his law degree and soon became a close friend of the former vice president. An important member of the Nixon team, Garment became an all-purpose troubleshooter for the president. The tough-talking administration’s informal envoy to both US Jewry and Israel, Garment (who describes his ex-boss as operationally progressive but rhetorically retrogressive on social issues) also worked on civil-rights programs. He was untainted by Watergate, but his comments on the scandal are marked with perception and compassion. He eventually returned to New York City to serve as Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s special assistant for human rights during his stint as US ambassador to the UN, and then resumed the practice of law. The book is an engaging recollection of a free-spirited advocate who learned from his experiences close to the seats of power.

The New York Court of Appeals: Women at the Top

DiFioreJanet DiFiore

On Thursday, January 21st, 2016, Janet DiFiore, former Westchester County District Attorney, was confirmed by the New York State Senate as the second female Chief Judge for the New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in New York State.  The chief judge of the Court of Appeals is also head of the New York State Court system.  Ms. DiFiore was nominated for this position by Judge Andrew Cuomo in December 2015.

Judge DiFiore was originally elected as Westchester County District Attorney in 2005 and then re-elected in 2009 and 2013.  She has been a strong advocate for those who are affected by both child and elder abuse, forming teams within her office to deal with these issues.

She has been a strong advocate of reviewing what could be possible wrongful convictions, and her office was able to overturn the conviction, based on a new DNA analysis of crime scene evidence, in the case of Jeffrey Deskovic, who had been wrongly convicted of the rape and murder of a high school classmate.

Ms. DiFiore led the effort to establish the Westchester Intelligence Center, where Westchester County’s many local police departments, county police, state police and other state, regional and federal law enforcement agencies share information.

Prior to becoming Westchester County District Attorney she was a Supreme Court Justice from 2003-2005 and a Westchester County Court Judge from 1998-2002.

 

Judith_S_Kaye_-225x300Judith Kaye

On January 7, 2016, Judge Judith Kaye, the first female Chief Judge for the New York Court of Appeals died after a courageous bout with cancer.

Judge Kaye was initially nominated to the position of associate judge by Governor Mario Cuomo in 1983 and she served in that position until 1993 when Chief Judge Sol Wachtler resigned and Cuomo appointed Judith Kaye as Chief Judge.  She served in that position until December 31, 2008, when she reached the mandatory retirement age of seventy.  She was not only the first female chief judge of the state of New York, but also the longest-serving chief judge.

During her many years on the court she worked hard to address problems on many fronts, but one of her primary concerns was improvement in the New York State jury system and she worked to change what she saw as problems in the system.  She was able to end automatic exemptions for certain groups so that more people would be available to serve and she also recommended the expansion of juror source lists to include unemployment and other lists that were not previously used.  She also had brochures and pamphlets developed for potential jurors so that they could understand the juror selection process and the work of a jury.  She also sought to improve courthouse facilities so that jurors would at least have a pleasant place to “serve their time.”

Judge Kaye led in the development of problem-solving courts that seek to address the underlying problems that brought people into the court system.  There are now courts that deal specifically with with drug, mental health and sex abuse issues as examples.

Judge Kaye received many honors and awards during her lifetime, as well as many honorary degrees.  At Brooklyn Law School’s 93rd commencement exercise on June 14, 1994, Judge Kaye was awarded an honorary degree and gave the commencement address.  At the end of her remarks, I’ll always remember her telling the graduates that she wished them “the same good luck and good sense in the future” as had gotten them to this day.  Spoken, I thought, like a wise judge, woman and mother.

The library has several books in its collection on the New York Court of Appeals, including:

The Judges of the New York Court of Appeals: A Biographical History

The History of the New York Court of Appeals

The Powers of the New York Court of Appeals

 

New Limits on Insider Trading?

A Wall Street Journal article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari to review the ruling by Judge Jed Rakoff in the case of Salman v. US, 792 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2015). Judge Rakoff, who usually sits on bench of the Southern District of New York, served as a visiting judge temporarily assigned to the Ninth Circuit and wrote the opinion in Salman, which disagreed with last year’s Second Circuit ruling in US v. Newman, 773 F. 3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014). The Newman decision overturned the insider trading convictions of former hedge-fund traders articulating a narrower definition of the crime. The issue in Salman is what constitutes insider trading in a case involving an Illinois businessman’s appeal of his conviction for making $1.2 million trading on tips about mergers from his brother-in-law, a Citigroup banker. With the grant of certiorari, the Supreme Court may now decide a key question in insider trading cases, namely what benefits corporate insiders need to receive for any information they disclose to traders to be illegal. The Justice Department warned that overturning the convictions in Newman prosecution could hinder the government’s campaign to curb insider trading on Wall Street. The Supreme Court denied certiorari in Newman.

Salman was convicted of 2013 of making investments based on confidential information he received from a family member who worked in the health care investment banking group at Citigroup Global Markets in NY. Co-defendants pleaded guilty in 2011 and were sentenced to probation. Salman was sentenced to 36 months in federal prison and ordered to pay more than $738,000 in restitution. His appeal cites the Second Circuit decision in Newman where the court ruled that prosecutors must prove that a defendant had direct knowledge of the leaker, realize that a breach of fiduciary duty occurred and know that the leaker received a personal benefit in exchange for the information. In Newman, the Second Circuit held that the evidence was insufficient to establish that the tippers received a personal benefit in exchange for the tip. The court also explained that there needed to be “proof of a meaningfully close personal relationship that generates an exchange that is objective, consequential, and represents at least a potential gain of a pecuniary or similarly valuable nature.” In other words,  the relationship should suggest a quid pro quo from the recipient.

InsiderBrooklyn Law School Library has an extensive collection of material on  insider trading, the latest of which is Insider Trading Law and Policy by Stephen Bainbridge (Call # KF1073.I5 B35 2014). The textbook is for use in law school classes on insider trading, securities regulation, or business associations. It offers a clear and direct exposition of the law and policy concerns raised by this important and hcircleigh-profile area of the law. The author provides sufficient detail for a complete understanding of the subject without getting bogged down in minutiae. A second item in the BLS Library collection is  worth reading: Circle of Friends: The Massive Federal Crackdown on Insider Trading—and Why the Markets Always Work Against the Little Guy by Charles Gasparino (Call # HG4928.5 .G38 2013). It is a riveting work of narrative nonfiction, as engrossing and explosive as fictional thrillers of the finest magnitude and should serve as a wake-up call to the investing public.

Supreme Court Affirmative Action, Redux

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Fisher v. University of Texas this past December. The case centers around the use of race in admissions at the University of Texas at Austin. The University of Texas at Austin considers race as one of various factors in its undergraduate admissions process. Abigail Fisher, who is Caucasian, was rejected for admission to the University’s 2008 entering class. She sued the University and school officials, alleging that the University’s consideration of race in admissions violated the Equal Protection Clause.  Ms. Fisher contends was rejected because of her race.

This case was originally argued before the Supreme Court in 2012 and the Justices issued a narrow opinion sending the case back down to a lower court for another look.  The Supreme Court has taken the case again and will issue their opinion sometime this year.

For those of you interested in this topic, I suggest you take a look at the following books in Library collection.​

bk2

 

Affirmative Action and Racial Equity is a critical resource which helps the reader understand the nuances of the affirmative action legal debate and identify the challenges and potential strategies toward racial equity and inclusion moving forward.

 

bk

 

Controversies in Affirmative Action  is an engaging and eclectic collection of essays from leading scholars on the subject, which looks at affirmative action past and present, analyzes its efficacy, its legacy, and its role in the future of the United States.

bk

What precisely is affirmative action, and why is it fiercely championed by some and just as fiercely denounced by others? Does it signify a boon or a stigma? Or is it simply reverse discrimination? What are its benefits and costs to American society? What are the indications determining who should or should not be accorded affirmative action? When should affirmative action end, if it must? In For Discrimination, Randall Kennedy gives a concise summary of the policy.

Episode 096 – Conversation with Prof. Anita Bernstein

Episode 096 – Conversation with Prof. Anita Bernstein.mp3

In this podcast, Brooklyn Law School Professor Anita Bernstein and Loren Pani, BLS Class of 2015, her research assistant, discuss her series of articles on legal malpractice written for the Outside Counsel column of the New York Law Journal. Professor Bernstein reports on a data set of legal malpractice decisions issued during the last five years by the appellate courts of New York. To date four columns have been published:  Nine Easy Ways to Breach Your Duty to a Real Estate Client, which appeared in the August 11, 2015 edition of the NYLJ; Avoidable and Actionable Errors by New York Personal Injury Lawyers, September 17, 2015; Matrimonial Malpractice Before, During and After a Client’s Divorce, October 30, 2015; and  Judiciary Law §487 Claims For Attorney Misconduct, November 24, 2015. The fifth entry in the series, “Legal Malpractice Liability for Criminal Defense: Rare, Yet Possible”, is slated for publication on December 30. Prof. Bernstein and Loren credit BLS Reference Librarian Kathleen Darvil for her assistance in compiling the data set.

Winter Break & Winter Session Hours

achri6The Library will be closed Thursday, December 24, 2015 through January 1, 2016 for Winter Break,

Saturday, January 2, 2016:  9am – 5pm

Sunday, January 3, 2016:  10am – 6pm

 

Winter Session, Monday, January 4 – Sunday, January 17:

Monday – Friday:  9am -10pm

Saturday:  9am – 10pm

Sunday:   10am – 10pm

Monday, January 18 (Martin Luther King, Jr. Day):  9am – 10pm

 

FDR Public Papers and Digital Speech Collections

Brooklyn Law School Library’s subscription to HeinOnline has many libraries including the U.S. Presidential Library with nearly 500,000 pages. Its titles include Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Public Papers of the Presidents, the Weekly Compilation of the Presidential Documents, and other documents relating to U.S. presidents. The Public Papers of the Presidents begins with Herbert Hoover and concludes with George W. Bush. Compiled and published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration since 1957 in response to a recommendation by the National Historical Publications Commission, they are a rich collection for researchers.

The Daily Compilation of the Presidential Documents is issued through the Office of the Federal Register and contains statements, messages and other Presidential material released by the White House. It also includes: speeches, press conferences, press releases, proclamations, executive orders, acts approved by the President, and many more documents. The predecessor title, the Weekly Compilation of the Presidential Documents, is also included. The collection contains a number of other titles, including the Economic Report of the President, Hearings before the President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, and the Public Papers and Address of Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

InfamyThe last collection of FDR material can now be used with the New Digital Speech Collections, recently released by the FDR Library with support from AT&T, Marist College and the Roosevelt Institute. Surprisingly it shows the famous FDR quotation in a speech just after the attack on Pearl Harbor as “a date which will live in infamy” was edited from the original “a date which will live in world history.” The collection links to FDR’s Master Speech File, one of the FDR library’s most in-demand archival collections. With over 46,000 pages of drafts, reading copies, and transcripts created throughout FDR’s career, it is the most extensive collection of primary source documents related to FDR’s lifetime of public addresses.

Alcohol Prohibition and Repeal

Eighty-two years ago, on December 5, 1933, Amendment XXI to the US Constitution was ratified, repealing Amendment XVIII which had mandated nationwide Prohibition on alcohol on January 17, 1920. The Twenty-First Amendment is the only one of the 27 amendments of the U.S. Constitution to repeal a prior amendment. It is also unique as having been ratified by state ratifying conventions rather than by state legislatures.

The story of National Prohibition of alcohol and its ultimate repeal seems an historical oddity with little meaning for 21st Century life. Yet only recently in November 2012, voters in Colorado and Washington voted to legalize the production and sale of cannabis for social use, a first not only in the United States but also the world. Medical cannabis is now legal in twenty states and Washington, D.C., and many Americans use it in place of conventional pharmaceuticals. Nevertheless the federal government continues to raid and arrest people: 49.5 percent of all drug-related arrests involve the sale, manufacture, or possession of cannabis.

AmendmentsThe story of alcohol prohibition under the Volstead Act is worth reviewing. Much of it is told in the Brooklyn Law Library’s copy of Amendments XVIII and XXI: Prohibition and Repeal by Sylvia Engdahl (Call # KF3919.A844 2009). Its 160 pages discuss the social and cultural forces that lead to Prohibition, the unintended consequences of the Eighteenth Amendment, the passage of the Twenty-first Amendment, and connections to the War on Drugs. National Prohibition was viewed by millions of Americans as the solution to the nation’s poverty, crime, violence, and other ills and they eagerly embraced it. After its adoption in 1920, Evangelist Billy Sunday staged a mock funeral for alcoholic beverages and then extolled on the benefits of prohibition. “The rein of tears is over,” he asserted. “The slums will soon be only a memory. We will turn our prisons into factories and our jails into storehouses and corncribs.” With the ban on alcohol which was seen as the cause of most, if not all, crime, some communities sold their jails.

It soon became clear that Prohibition not only failed in its promises but actually created other serious and disturbing social problems leading to an increasing disillusionment by millions of Americans. Journalist H. L. Mencken wrote in 1925 that “Five years of prohibition have had, at least, this one benign effect: they have completely disposed of all the favorite arguments of the Prohibitionists. None of the great boons and usufructs that were to follow the passage of the Eighteenth Amendment has come to pass. There is not less drunkenness in the Republic but more. There is not less crime, but more. There is not less insanity, but more. The cost of government is not smaller, but vastly greater. Respect for law has not increased, but diminished.”

It was nine prominent New York lawyers, organized as the Voluntary Committee of Lawyers and chaired by eminent Park Avenue lawyer and Harvard Law School graduate Joseph H. Choate, Jr., who helped bring about Prohibition’s repeal. In 1927, the lawyers formed the VCL declaring as their purpose “to preserve the spirit of the Constitution of the United States [by] bringing about the repeal of the so-called Volstead Act and the Eighteenth Amendment.” With this modest platform they undertook first to draft and promote repeal resolutions for local and state bar associations. Their success culminated with the American Bar Association calling for repeal in 1928, after scores of city and state bar associations in all regions of the country had spoken unambiguously, in words and ideas cultivated, shaped, and sharpened by the VCL. For more on this remarkable story, see The VCL: Architects of Repeal by Richard M. Evans.

Library Study Room Reservations & Library Hours for the Reading & Exam Period

During the reading and exam period all students must make a reservation to use a library study room.  Mandatory study room reservations will begin this Friday, December 4th at 8:00am.   All study rooms will be locked on  Friday, December 4th.  In order to access your reserved study room, you must go to the first floor circulation desk to charge out the key.

The link to the study room reservations is on the library homepage under “Related Links” on the right side of the page.rl

Study Room Policies:

·         Study rooms are for the use of groups of two or more students

·         Study rooms may be reserved for the current day and two days ahead

·         Study rooms may be reserved for periods from 30 minutes up to four hours

·         Students are permitted to reserve one study room for a maximum of four hours per day

·         Study room reservations are monitored and reservations violating these policies will be deleted

·         Instructions for making reservations and a list of rooms available are on the study room reservations page

 Library Hours for the Reading & Exam Period:

·         Friday, December 4th – Monday, December 21:  8:00am – 2:00am

·         Tuesday, December 22nd:  8:00am – 10:00pm

On Wednesday, December 23rd, the library will be open from 9:00am – 5:00pm.

 Good luck on your exams.

Tax Havens and Income Inequality

The Brooklyn Law School Library New Books List for November 11, 2015 has 88 items with 65 print volumes and 23 e-books. The entries cover a wide range of subjects from Lotteries (American Sweepstakes: How One Small State Bucked the Church, the Feds, and the Mob to Usher in the Lottery Age) to Discrimination in Criminal Justice (Crime, Inequality and Power) to Prostitution (Getting Screwed: Sex Workers and the Law) to Freedom of Expression (Lessons in Censorship: How Schools and Courts Subvert Students’ First Amendment Rights) to Race Relations (Liberalizing Lynching: Building a New Racialized State).

Hidden WealthAlso included is The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens (Call # HJ2336 .Z8313 2015) by Gabriel Zucman (translated by Teresa Lavender Fagan from the French original Richesse Cachée des Nations and with a foreword by noted economist Thomas Piketty, author of Capital in the Twenty-First Century). This slim 129 page book claims to be the “the first serious economic research” into tax haven activity and an important work that anyone interested in tax havens, social justice, defeating inequality and delivering tax reform should read. The author is a French economist based at the University of California, Berkeley, and part of a network of doing valuable work on inequality, wealth, tax and the difficulties caused by the uneven distribution of capital resources in society. Although the book fails to define what a tax haven is, it does set out a campaign on tax havens in the second half of this book which makes a lot of sense. The book recommends the creation of a global register of financial asset wealth holding. This suggestion could be a practical and necessary step in the assembly of the data needed for the global wealth tax proposed in his book.

Whether country-by-country reporting can be an effective foundation for a taxation of multinational corporations is an open question. Country-by-country reporting may well permit tax authorities to determine what proportion of the sales, employees and assets of a multinational corporation are located in its jurisdiction. Similarly, if a global register of wealth could be established, the data needed to tax global wealth would have been created. The book is worth reading of its vision of an activist committed to promoting a new and radical solution that he has identified. Not many academics take on the role of the public intellectual who demands action to address a problem that they have identified. This one does.

Price We PayReaders interested on this topic may want to view The Price We Pay, a documentary inspired by another French book La Crise Fiscale qui Vient. Director Harold Crooks looks at the dirty world of corporate malfeasance and the dark history and dire present-day reality of big-business tax avoidance, which has seen multinationals depriving governments of trillions of dollars in tax revenues by harboring profits in offshore havens. Tax havens, originally created by London bankers in the 50s, today put over half the world’s stock of money beyond reach of public treasuries. Nation states are being reshaped by this offshoring of the world’s wealth. Tax avoidance by big corporations and the wealthy is paving the way to historic levels of inequality and placing the tax burden on the middle class and the poor. Crusading journalists, tax justice campaigners and former finance and technology industry insiders speak frankly about the  trends carrying the Western world to an unsustainable future.